Reference checks are pivotal in hiring, with differing views on their efficacy. While some see them as crucial, others doubt their reliability due to potential bias. Research suggests a validity of 0.26 for traditional reference checks, indicating moderate predictiveness for job performance. Digital methods, offering confidentiality and efficiency, may enhance this by enabling broader feedback. Analysis suggests contacting four references optimizes validity and reduces attrition, providing a more comprehensive candidate assessment. Harver's digital solution supports this efficient, more effective approach, suggesting that the method and volume of reference checks significantly influence their usefulness.

Join for free to read