Home

Case Study

City Chooses Distributed Wastewater Over Coventional Sewer

City Chooses Distributed Wastewater Over Coventional Sewer

Aquapoint
Pages 4 Pages

The Sewer Committee agreed they did not want put an unfair burden on the taxpayers in anticipation of growth so they decided to look at a decentralized (distributed) wastewater treatment solution that could be expanded as the city grew. Bob Conrad outlined the 4 key reasons a distributed sewer solution made more sense for Piperton: 1. Development can be on a "pay as you build" basis 2. Low operational manpower requirements 3. The drip/d

Join for free to read

Related Solution Sets

Wastewater Collection & Treatment - Municipal

You Might Also Like


DAIRY PROCESS-WASTEWATER PRETREATMENT
Case Study DAIRY PROCESS-WASTEWATER PRETREATMENT
World Water Works

Lincoln, Nebraska - Sewer system
Case Study Lincoln, Nebraska - Sewer system
IPEX USA

City of Steamboat Springs Wastewater Treatment Facility
Case Study City of Steamboat Springs Wastewater Treatment Facility
Forsta Filters

City of Baltimore Sanitary Sewer Over?ow Consent Decree Program | Maryland, US
Case Study City of Baltimore Sanitary Sewer Over?ow Consent Decree Program…
Louis Berger

More from Aquapoint


Why the Navy chose Distributed Wastewater Infrastructure for Guantanamo Bay
Case Study Why the Navy chose Distributed Wastewater Infrastructure for…
Aquapoint

City Gains Asset and Water for Irrigation with Decentralized Plant
Case Study City Gains Asset and Water for Irrigation with Decentralized…
Aquapoint

Otis Municipal
Case Study Otis Municipal
Aquapoint

Lowes Pembroke
Case Study Lowes Pembroke
Aquapoint
© 2025 Contentree.  All Rights Reserved   |   Privacy and Cookies   |   Legal   |   Do not sell my info