CASE STUDY: STANDARDIZING SPARE PARTS NAMING ENHANCES MAINTENANCE EFFICIENCY FOR POWER GENERATION COMPANY

4 Pages

A leading power generation company with three plants struggled with spare parts chaos from inconsistent naming and zero inventory visibility, stalling Bills of Materials (BoMs) creation on its Asset Performance Management roadmap. MaxGrip intervened, standardizing nomenclature, illuminating full inventory, and automating BoMs—eradicating discrepancies, enhancing tracking accuracy, and streamlining procurement/maintenance. The company unlocked maintenance efficiency, slashed stockouts/downtime, optimized spend, and propelled reliable operations across sites.

Join for free to read

White Paper Maximizing power generation

Case Study Xylem prices spare parts and +1 million configurations…

Case Study AVEVA Improves GenOn Power Station Operational Efficiency &…

White Paper Asset optimization in power generation

More from MaxGrip

Case Study MAINTENANCE COST AND QUALITY AUDIT MAINTENANCE LABOR COST…

Case Study MAINTENANCE EXCELLENCE PROGRAM FOR VICTREX IMPROVES…

Case Study Learn How This Energy Company Saved $1.75 Million YoY by…

Case Study CLUSTERED MAINTENANCE AT WATERNET: A FUTURE-PROOF MAINTENANCE…

Case Study

CASE STUDY: STANDARDIZING SPARE PARTS NAMING ENHANCES MAINTENANCE EFFICIENCY FOR POWER GENERATION COMPANY

CASE STUDY: STANDARDIZING SPARE PARTS NAMING ENHANCES MAINTENANCE EFFICIENCY FOR POWER GENERATION COMPANY

You Might Also Like

More from MaxGrip