The document highlights the hidden costs and inefficiencies associated with legacy security architectures, particularly in managing workload security. Legacy systems, including on-premise and third-party tools, create operational complexity, increase costs, and elevate security risks, such as ransomware and data breaches. By contrast, a modern zero trust-based architecture offers significant savings in total cost of ownership, reduces operational complexity, and enhances security by eliminating lateral movement and minimizing attack surfaces. The comparison shows that adopting a cloud-native, zero trust approach can lead to substantial cost savings and improved security for hybrid workloads.

Join for free to read