After the judge excluded a key part of the analysis of the plaintiffs’ damages expert, a jury in the Eastern District of Texas found for defendant Intel in this patent case. Following a ruling in which the judge excluded a key part of the analysis of the plaintiffs’ damages expert, a jury in the Eastern District of Texas found Intel Corporation not liable for infringement of a patent purportedly relating to error detection in server microprocessors. In a comprehensive victory for Intel, the jury also found that the underlying patent was invalid. Cornerstone Research worked with two experts on behalf of defendant Intel to respond to the opinions of the plaintiffs’ damages expert. Professor Lorin Hitt of the Wharton School, University of Pennsylvania, submitted a critique of the plaintiffs’

Join for free to read