Case Study

Resolving opposing views requires an unbiased assessment.

Resolving opposing views requires an unbiased assessment.

Pages 1 Pages

905-794-2325 ecometrix.ca Resolving opposing views requires an unbiased assessment. Cumulative Impact study Challenge The development of two pulp mills along the Río Uruguay, which forms a natural border between Uruguay and Argentina, became a heated standoff between the two countries due to their opposing views concerning the perceived environmental and socio-economic effects. What represented a considerable benefit for the economy of Uruguay was seen as a significant environmental risk by Argentina. Resolving such opposing views requires an unbiased and technically defensible assessment, the details of which must be distilled into terms that are meaningful, respectful and relevant to all stakeholders. The IFC, as lead investor, sought its own independent assessment.

Join for free to read